Dialectica Open the atlas

India · fl. 6th–5th c. BCE

Ajita Kesakambalī

Materialist teacher of the Buddha’s time, named for his hair blanket

Wrote nothing that survives. As reported in the Buddhist Sāmaññaphala Sutta, he taught that a person is made of four elements that disperse at death, so there is no fruit of good or bad deeds and no other world.

Life and thought

Ajita Kesakambalī—“Ajita of the hair blanket”, after the garment of human hair he reportedly wore—was one of six famous wandering teachers active in the Ganges valley in the Buddha’s lifetime, in the 5th century BCE. None of his own words survive. We know him only through his rivals: the Pali Sāmaññaphala Sutta, in which King Ajātasattu reports what each teacher told him, and later Jain sources.

As reported there, Ajita taught a thoroughgoing materialism. A person is made of earth, water, fire and air; at death these return to their elements and the senses scatter into space. There is no other world, no fruit of good or bad deeds and no rebirth: fools and wise alike, the sutta has him say, are cut off and perish when the body breaks up. Gifts and sacrifices are therefore pointless. Buddhists made this the classic case of “annihilationism”, the wrong view that denies moral consequence, and later Indian authors treated him as a forerunner of the Cārvāka or Lokāyata school.

Criticised by

c. 480–400 BCE (debated; an older dating is c. 563–483 BCE)The Buddha (Siddhārtha Gautama)The Buddhist canon presents Ajita’s denial of karmic fruit as a paradigm ‘wrong view’.

Meanwhile, in other traditions

c. 586–526 BCEAnaximenesThird Milesian, who made air the first principletraditionally 6th c. BCELaoziLegendary sage credited with the Daodejingc. 570–495 BCEPythagorasFounder of a philosophical and religious brotherhood at Croton551–479 BCE (traditional)ConfuciusTeacher from Lu who sought to revive the Zhou wayc. 535–475 BCEHeraclitusRiddling sage of Ephesus who saw the world as ordered fluxc. 515 – after 450 BCEParmenidesFounder of the Eleatic school and of deductive argument