Dialectica Open the atlas

China & East Asia · c. 4th c. BCE – today

Daoism

The Dao, the nameless way of all things, works without forcing; people flourish by returning to spontaneity and acting through non-action (wuwei).

The question

How can we live in accord with the way things naturally go?

Why it arose

While the Warring States schools competed to offer rules for restoring order, Daoist texts questioned the whole project of names, rules and striving, which they saw as a cause of disorder. The Laozi (Daodejing) took shape over the 4th and 3rd centuries BCE, and the writings gathered under Zhuangzi’s name developed a playful, sceptical voice.

The reasoning

Every distinction we make, such as good and bad or useful and useless, depends on its opposite and on a point of view. Imposing such distinctions on the world distorts its natural course. So the sage acts without forcing, and the best ruler interferes least.

Key claims
  1. The Dao that can be spoken of is not the constant Dao.
  2. Softness and yielding overcome hardness.
  3. All distinctions depend on a point of view.
What it left

It shaped Chinese religion, painting, poetry, medicine and political thought, and fed Xuanxue and Chan Buddhism; the Daodejing is among the most translated books in the world.

MetaphysicsEthicsPolitics

Thinkers

traditionally 6th c. BCELaoziLegendary sage credited with the Daodejingc. 369–286 BCEZhuangziDaoist writer of parables, paradoxes and freedom

Key texts

c. 300 BCEDaodejing (Laozi)Laozi
c. 290 BCEZhuangziZhuangzi

Where it came from

Reacted against
ConfucianismThe Daodejing treats Confucian virtues as symptoms of decline: “when the great Dao is abandoned, there are humaneness and righteousness.”

What it led to

Borrowed by
LegalismHan Feizi wrote chapters explaining the Laozi and borrowed its image of a still, empty ruler who acts through non-action.
Carried on by
Xuanxue (“Profound Learning”)Wang Bi and Guo Xiang built their metaphysics as commentaries on the Laozi and the Zhuangzi.
Borrowed by
Chan / Zen BuddhismDaoist ideals of spontaneity and the inadequacy of words gave Chinese Buddhists a native language for awakening beyond concepts.
Borrowed by
Neo-Confucianism (Cheng–Zhu school)Zhou Dunyi’s Diagram of the Supreme Ultimate is traditionally traced to Daoist cosmological diagrams.

Its answers to the big questions

MetaphysicsWhat is ultimately real?The Dao: nameless, it gives rise to the ten thousand things and they return to it.EthicsHow should one live?Stop forcing things. Act without contrivance (wu wei) and let things follow their nature.Logic & languageCan words grasp the truth?The Dao that can be told is not the constant Dao.