Dialectica Open the atlas

China & East Asia · c. 350–200 BCE

Legalism

Order comes not from virtue but from clear public laws, impartial rewards and punishments, and the ruler’s command of power and technique.

The question

How can a state become rich, strong and orderly?

Why it arose

The Warring States were fighting for survival, and reforming ministers such as Shang Yang in Qin reorganised whole states around farming, war and law. Han Feizi, a student of Xunzi, drew these ideas together shortly before Qin unified China in 221 BCE.

The reasoning

People reliably seek benefit and avoid harm, while truly virtuous people are rare. So a ruler should not wait for sages but steer ordinary people with fixed laws (fa), rewards and punishments, backed by his position of power (shi) and techniques for controlling ministers (shu).

Key claims
  1. Publish laws and apply them equally to all below the ruler.
  2. Rewards and punishments steer self-interest.
  3. The ruler must hold on to power and technique.
What it left

It guided Qin’s unification and was officially discredited after Qin’s fall, yet its administrative methods lived on inside the imperial state, often summed up as “Confucian outside, Legalist inside”.

Politics

Thinkers

c. 390–338 BCEShang YangQin minister whose reforms built Qin’s powerc. 280–233 BCEHan FeiziPrince of Han who synthesised Legalist thought

Key texts

c. 300 BCEThe Book of Lord ShangShang Yang
c. 240 BCEHan FeiziHan Feizi

Where it came from

Reacted against
ConfucianismHan Feizi kept his teacher Xunzi’s view that human nature is selfish but rejected rule by virtue in favour of rule by law.
Borrowed from
DaoismHan Feizi wrote chapters explaining the Laozi and borrowed its image of a still, empty ruler who acts through non-action.

Its answers to the big questions

PoliticsWhat makes power legitimate?Not virtue but clear laws, rewards and punishments, applied the same to all.