India · c. 5th c. BCE – today
Early Buddhism & Abhidharma
Suffering comes from craving rooted in ignorance of impermanence and non-self, and it can be ended by following the Eightfold Path.
Why do we suffer, and how can suffering end?
Siddhārtha Gautama joined the śramaṇa wanderers, tried and rejected both a comfortable life and extreme austerity, and taught a ‘middle way’. After his death his discourses were memorised and later written down; Abhidharma scholars then systematised them into analyses of momentary physical and mental events (dharmas).
Everything we might call ‘me’—body, feeling, perception, mental formations, consciousness—is impermanent and conditioned, so none of it is a lasting self. Clinging to what cannot last produces suffering; remove the craving through ethics, meditation and insight, and the suffering it feeds ceases (nirvāṇa).
- Four Noble Truths: suffering, its cause, its cessation, the path.
- No permanent self underlies the five aggregates.
- All conditioned things arise dependently and pass away.
Buddhism spread across Asia and gave rise to Madhyamaka, Yogācāra and the East Asian schools; its analysis of the self is now discussed alongside Hume and contemporary philosophy of mind.
Thinkers
c. 480–400 BCE (debated; an older dating is c. 563–483 BCE)The Buddha (Siddhārtha Gautama)Founder of Buddhism, who taught a middle way out of sufferingfl. 5th c. CEBuddhaghosaTheravāda commentator who systematised doctrine in Sri LankaKey texts
Where it came from
Reacted againstVedic & Upanishadic thoughtThe Buddha kept karma and rebirth but denied the permanent ātman that the Upanishads identified with Brahman.
What it led to
Carried on byMadhyamakaNāgārjuna radicalised the Buddha’s dependent origination and non-self, turning them against the Abhidharma belief that the basic elements have their own nature.Carried on by
YogācāraYogācāra pushed the Abhidharma analysis of mind further, concluding that experience can be explained by consciousness alone.Opposed by
MīmāṃsāKumārila defended Vedic authority and a lasting self against Buddhist critics, and denied that the Buddha or anyone could be omniscient.