Dialectica Open the atlas

Analytic & pragmatist · 1958 – today

Virtue ethics revival

Ethics should ask what kind of person to be and what makes a human life go well, not only which rules or consequences make acts right.

The question

What kind of person should I be?

Why it arose

In 1958 Elizabeth Anscombe argued that modern moral philosophy, both Kantian duty and consequentialism, relied on a notion of moral “obligation” left over from a divine-law ethics it no longer believed in. She urged a return to Aristotle’s questions about virtue and human flourishing, and Philippa Foot and Alasdair MacIntyre took up the call.

The reasoning

Virtues such as courage, justice and honesty are traits a human being needs in order to flourish, much as a wolf needs to hunt with its pack. A right action is what a virtuous person would characteristically do in the situation. Because virtues are learned within practices and communities, ethics cannot be separated from character, emotion and tradition.

Key claims
  1. Character, not rules, is the centre of ethics.
  2. Virtues are the traits humans need to flourish.
  3. Moral reasoning lives within practices and traditions.
What it left

It became one of the three main approaches in normative ethics, alongside consequentialism and deontology, and shapes medical, business and professional ethics.

Ethics

Thinkers

1919–2001G. E. M. AnscombeWittgenstein’s student and translator who relaunched virtue ethics1920–2010Philippa FootOxford moral philosopher who devised the trolley problem1929–2025Alasdair MacIntyreScottish-born philosopher who moved from Marxism to Thomism

Key texts

1958Modern Moral PhilosophyG. E. M. Anscombe
1981After VirtueAlasdair MacIntyre
2001Natural GoodnessPhilippa Foot

Where it came from

Grew out of
AristotelianismThe revival returned directly to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: virtue, practical wisdom and eudaimonia, human flourishing.
Reacted against
UtilitarianismAnscombe coined the word “consequentialism” in 1958 to attack the idea that acts are right purely because of their outcomes.
Reacted against
Kant’s critical philosophyVirtue ethicists rejected morality as obedience to universal rules, and Anscombe called Kant’s idea of legislating for oneself absurd.
Grew out of
ScholasticismAnscombe and Foot drew on Aquinas’s ethics, and MacIntyre came to see Thomism as the strongest form of the Aristotelian tradition.